PRACTICE  /  TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS

You picked the name
before anyone checked whether you could keep it.

Most trademark problems are decided long before anyone files anything. They are decided the afternoon the name gets chosen, when someone buys the domain name, the presentation and marketing decks and templates, and the brand icon. Nobody ran a formal search because the search felt like a formality.

A clearance search done early is cheap and occasionally disappointing. The same search done after launch is expensive and occasionally fatal — because by then the name is in the product, the contracts, the reviews and the search results, and changing it costs all of that at once.

Registration is the part everyone pictures, and it is genuinely useful — though not because it is what makes a name enforceable. Rights can arise from use alone, but they reach only as far as the trade behind them. Registration is what extends that reach, giving a nationwide claim of priority against later adopters, and it is what a marketplace, an investor or an acquirer will ask to see. It still follows from the clearance decision rather than substituting for it.

A mark used for services rather than goods is a service mark, and the same body of law governs it. The distinction matters at the application stage, because what is claimed has to match what the business actually does — a firm that sells software and also runs training may need both, in different classes, and the evidence of use differs for each.

Enforcement is the third act. Someone launches close to your mark and you have to decide how hard to push, how fast, and whether pushing at all is worth what it costs and what it signals. That is a business judgment with legal consequences, and it is worth making deliberately.

The same analysis runs in reverse when the letter arrives addressed to you. A demand is an assertion, not an adjudication: it may be well founded, overstated, or aimed at a market the sender does not actually occupy. Working out which — who used the mark first, in what territory, and whether confusion is genuinely likely — comes before deciding whether to change the name.

WHAT THIS USUALLY INVOLVES
Not every naming problem is a trademark problem.

A fight over a name can turn out to be a contract dispute, a disagreement about what a departing co-founder agreed to, or a straightforward conflict between two marks. Each calls for a different response, so the first task is working out which one you have.

Start a consultation
OTHER PRACTICE AREAS